![]() Sixty-eight members parti- cipated in the survey: 82.4% of the respondents answered that they were satisfied with the simulator and 92.1% said that using the simulator had an exercise effect. Figure 18 shows the simulator setup for this testing. ![]() Afterward, we conducted a survey of members who had experienced some kind of horse simulator from a sports club. ![]() These gaits have different speeds as well as motion trajectories, as listed in Table 2. ![]() After adjusting the motion trajectory of the simulator, the displacements and rotation angles of the saddle reference frame for three gaits-walk- ing, trotting, and cantering-were measured, as listed in Table 3. Referee and other expert feedback enabled the development of better motion trajec- tory and reaction compensation. The subjective similarity evaluated by the referees was low in the initial development phase. The referees comprehensively evaluated motion trajectory, foot contact timing, and horse reaction, and the system was improved according to the feedback of the experts. Evaluation of experts had been conducted three times a week over 3 months. Two official eques- trian referees from the Korea Equestrian Federation participated, as shown in Figure 17. were unable to find a standardized method to measure the similarity between a real horse and a simulator from previous research, and so rather than a quantitative evalua- tion, testing by experts was conducted.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |